Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Responsa for Bava Kamma 63:6

אלא הא קתני שלזה רשות להלך ולזה רשות להלך

where this one [the defendant] was entering [as if] into his own domain, and the other [the plaintiff] was [similarly] entering [as if] into his own domain, it is nevertheless considered [in the eye of the law]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Referring to Deut. XIX, 5: As when a man goeth into the wood with his neighbour to hew wood, and his hand fetcheth a stroke with the axe to cut down the tree and the head slippeth from the helve and lighteth upon his neighbour… cf. also infra p. 175 ');"><sup>4</sup></span>

Teshuvot Maharam

Q. A often beats his wife. She begged him to promise not to beat her any more, but he refused to make any such promise. Even when she appeared in the Synagogue to demand that A pay the debts she had contracted in order to pay for her sustenance [probably during a period of separation], A stubbornly refused to promise that in the future he would refrain from beating her.
A. A must pay for his wife's sustenance since by his action he has shown that he had not decided to desist from his shameful practice. One deserves greater punishment for striking his wife than for striking another person, for he is enjoined to respect her. Far be it from a Jew to do such a thing. Had a similar case come before us we should hasten to excommunicate him. Thus, R. Paltoi Gaon rules that a husband who constantly quarrels with his wife must remove the causes of such quarrels, if possible, or divorce her and pay her the ketubah; how much more must a husband be punished, who not only quarrels but actually beats his wife.
SOURCES: Cr. 291; B. p. 319 no. 780; Mordecai Hagadol, p. 182a.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse